<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<xml>
<title>Illinois General Assembly - Bill Status for SB 1824   </title>
<shortdesc>DISSOL-LIFE INS-MAINTENANCE</shortdesc>
<sponsor>
<sponsorhead1>Senate Sponsors</sponsorhead1><sponsors>Sen. Matt Murphy</sponsors>
<sponsorhead2>House Sponsors</sponsorhead2><altsponsors>(Rep. Jil Tracy)</altsponsors>
</sponsor>
<lastaction>
<statusdate>8/26/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Public Act . . . . . . . . . 97-0608</action>
</lastaction>
<synopsis>
<synopsistitle></synopsistitle>
<reference>750 ILCS 5/503</reference><aliasreference>from Ch. 40, par. 503</aliasreference><reference>750 ILCS 5/504</reference><aliasreference>from Ch. 40, par. 504</aliasreference><reference>750 ILCS 5/505</reference><aliasreference>from Ch. 40, par. 505</aliasreference><reference>750 ILCS 5/510</reference><aliasreference>from Ch. 40, par. 510</aliasreference><SynopsisText>Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides that life insurance benefits deemed to be marital property must be allocated equitably between the parties by the court. Provides that a maintenance award ordered by a court may be secured by existing or court-ordered life insurance and, if applicable, that a judgment shall expressly set forth that payments for such insurance are excludable under the Internal Revenue Code from the gross income of the maintenance payee. Provides that in determining an award for child support, net income does not include life insurance premiums for life insurance ordered by the court to secure child support or maintenance. Provides that upon death of either party or remarriage of the party receiving maintenance, any obligation under the new provisions is terminated without a prior inconsistent agreement between the parties.</SynopsisText><synopsistitle>House Committee Amendment No. 1</synopsistitle>
<SynopsisText>Further amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides that an award of maintenance, upon entry of a dissolution of judgment or upon entry of an award of maintenance following a reservation of maintenance in a dissolution judgment, may be reasonably secured (instead of an award of maintenance may be reasonably secured), in whole or in part, by life insurance on the payor's life. Provides that in determining the maximum level of death benefit coverage, the court shall take into account all relevant facts and circumstances, including the impact on access to life insurance by the maintenance payor. Provides that if in resolving any issues concerning life insurance under these provisions, a court reviews any submitted or proposed application for new insurance on the life of a maintenance payor, the review shall be in camera.</SynopsisText></synopsis>
<actions>
<statusdate>2/9/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Filed with Secretary by Sen. Matt Murphy</action>
<statusdate>2/9/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>First Reading</action>
<statusdate>2/9/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Referred to Assignments</action>
<statusdate>3/2/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Assigned to Judiciary</action>
<statusdate>3/10/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Do Pass Judiciary;  008-000-000</action>
<statusdate>3/10/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 15, 2011</action>
<statusdate>3/15/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Second Reading</action>
<statusdate>3/15/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 16, 2011</action>
<statusdate>4/15/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As May 4, 2011</action>
<statusdate>5/3/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/3/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Arrived in House</action>
<statusdate>5/3/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading</action>
<statusdate>5/3/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Chief House Sponsor Rep. Jil Tracy</action>
<statusdate>5/4/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>First Reading</action>
<statusdate>5/4/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Referred to Rules Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/11/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/11/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Jil Tracy</action>
<statusdate>5/11/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/13/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Committee Deadline Extended-Rule 9(b) May 20, 2011</action>
<statusdate>5/16/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee</action>
<statusdate>5/18/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee;  by Voice Vote</action>
<statusdate>5/18/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee;  011-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/18/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/20/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Second Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/20/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate</action>
<statusdate>5/25/2011</statusdate><chamber>House</chamber><action>Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 117-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/25/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1</action>
<statusdate>5/25/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1 -  May 26, 2011</action>
<statusdate>5/27/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Matt Murphy</action>
<statusdate>5/27/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Assignments</action>
<statusdate>5/27/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Assignments Referred to Judiciary</action>
<statusdate>5/27/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Judiciary;  006-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/29/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs 053-000-000</action>
<statusdate>5/29/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Passed Both Houses</action>
<statusdate>6/27/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Sent to the Governor</action>
<statusdate>8/26/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Governor Approved</action>
<statusdate>8/26/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Effective Date January 1, 2012</action>
<statusdate>8/26/2011</statusdate><chamber>Senate</chamber><action>Public Act . . . . . . . . . 97-0608</action>
</actions>
</xml>

