|
|
|||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 299
| ||||||
| 2 | WHEREAS, Lake Michigan is a valuable fresh water resource | ||||||
| 3 | for the State of Illinois; and
| ||||||
| 4 | WHEREAS, Pollution in Lake Michigan is a long-running | ||||||
| 5 | problem for the citizens of the State who use the Lake as a | ||||||
| 6 | primary source of drinking water; and
| ||||||
| 7 | WHEREAS, The beaches of Lake Michigan provide a significant | ||||||
| 8 | source of tourism income for the State of Illinois and other | ||||||
| 9 | states bordering the Lake; and
| ||||||
| 10 | WHEREAS, The British Petroleum oil refinery in Whiting, | ||||||
| 11 | Indiana is planning an expansion that would increase the | ||||||
| 12 | refinery's discharges into the Lake significantly, including | ||||||
| 13 | 54% more ammonia (for a total discharge of 1,584 pounds of | ||||||
| 14 | ammonia per day) and 35% more total suspended solids (for a | ||||||
| 15 | total discharge of 4,925 pounds of sludge per day) on a daily | ||||||
| 16 | basis, running contrary to years of efforts to clean up the | ||||||
| 17 | Great Lakes; and
| ||||||
| 18 | WHEREAS, Ammonia promotes algae blooms that can kill fish | ||||||
| 19 | in the Lake; and
| ||||||
| 20 | WHEREAS, The increased discharge into the Lake runs counter | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | to a provision of the federal Clean Water Act that prohibits | ||||||
| 2 | any downgrade in water quality near a pollution source, such as | ||||||
| 3 | the British Petroleum refinery; and | ||||||
| 4 | WHEREAS, Indiana State regulators are allowing British | ||||||
| 5 | Petroleum to install equipment that mixes its waste with clean | ||||||
| 6 | lake water about 200 feet offshore, and actively diluting | ||||||
| 7 | pollution in this way is banned in Lake Michigan under Indiana | ||||||
| 8 | law; and | ||||||
| 9 | WHEREAS, The Indiana Department of Environmental | ||||||
| 10 | Management granted British Petroleum the first-ever exemption | ||||||
| 11 | to allow the pollution "mixing zone" in Lake Michigan; and | ||||||
| 12 | WHEREAS, Environmental regulators remain unsure about the | ||||||
| 13 | ecological effects of the relatively new refining process that | ||||||
| 14 | British Petroleum plans to use and the increased discharge into | ||||||
| 15 | Lake Michigan; and | ||||||
| 16 | WHEREAS, State and federal environmental regulators have | ||||||
| 17 | agreed that there is not enough room at the British Petroleum | ||||||
| 18 | site to upgrade the refinery's water treatment plant; and | ||||||
| 19 | WHEREAS, The United States Environmental Protection Agency | ||||||
| 20 | has not objected to the State of Indiana's decision to allow | ||||||
| 21 | the increased discharge by British Petroleum; therefore, be it
| ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-FIFTH GENERAL | ||||||
| 2 | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we strongly urge the | ||||||
| 3 | United States Environmental Protection Agency to follow a | ||||||
| 4 | strict interpretation of the federal Clean Water Act to | ||||||
| 5 | minimize any additional pollution into Lake Michigan; and be it | ||||||
| 6 | further
| ||||||
| 7 | RESOLVED, That we urge British Petroleum to review and | ||||||
| 8 | reconsider the wastewater treatment facilities proposed to | ||||||
| 9 | serve the expansion and reconfiguration of its Whiting, Indiana | ||||||
| 10 | refinery with the specific intent to supplement or enhance | ||||||
| 11 | treatment efficiencies to eliminate or reduce projected | ||||||
| 12 | increases in ammonia nitrogen and total suspended solids | ||||||
| 13 | discharged into Lake Michigan; and be it further | ||||||
| 14 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | ||||||
| 15 | Protection Agency to prohibit the Whiting, Indiana British | ||||||
| 16 | Petroleum refinery from increasing the refinery's current | ||||||
| 17 | discharges of ammonia and sludge into Lake Michigan until the | ||||||
| 18 | ecological and environmental impact of the increased | ||||||
| 19 | discharges is fully understood by federal and state | ||||||
| 20 | environmental regulators; and be it further
| ||||||
| 21 | RESOLVED, That we urge the United States Environmental | ||||||
| 22 | Protection Agency to require more investigation into the | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| 1 | possibility of expanding the British Petroleum refinery's | ||||||
| 2 | water treatment plant before allowing the refinery to proceed | ||||||
| 3 | with current plans for increased pollution discharge into Lake | ||||||
| 4 | Michigan; and be it further | ||||||
| 5 | RESOLVED, That we urge the Illinois delegation to the | ||||||
| 6 | United States Congress to take legislative action against any | ||||||
| 7 | planned increase in the discharge of pollution into Lake | ||||||
| 8 | Michigan that is contrary to the federal Clean Water Act and | ||||||
| 9 | threatens the health of the environment of this State; and be | ||||||
| 10 | it further | ||||||
| 11 | RESOLVED, That a suitable copy of this resolution be | ||||||
| 12 | delivered to each member of the Illinois delegation to the | ||||||
| 13 | United States Congress, to the administrator of the United | ||||||
| 14 | States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, | ||||||
| 15 | and to the Great Lakes National Program Manager for the United | ||||||
| 16 | States Environmental Protection Agency, Mary A. Gade.
| ||||||