|   
 | 
| Public Act 096-0026 
 | 
| 
| SB1489 Enrolled | LRB096 10752 JDS 20941 b |  | 
| 
 
 | 
|     AN ACT concerning safety.
 | 
|     Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
  | 
| represented in the General Assembly:
 | 
|     Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Green  | 
| Infrastructure for Clean Water Act.
 | 
|     Section 5. Definitions. As used in this Act: | 
|     "Agency" means the Illinois Environmental Protection  | 
| Agency. | 
|     "Green infrastructure" means any storm water management  | 
| technique or practice employed with the primary goal of  | 
| preserving, restoring, or mimicking natural hydrology. Green  | 
| infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, methods of  | 
| using soil and vegetation to promote soil percolation,  | 
| evapotranspiration, and filtration. Green infrastructure  | 
| includes the preservation and restoration of natural landscape  | 
| features, such as forests, floodplains, headwaters, and  | 
| wetlands. Green infrastructure also includes rain gardens,  | 
| permeable pavements, green roofs, infiltration planters, trees  | 
| and tree boxes, and rainwater harvesting for non-potable uses,  | 
| such as toilet flushing and landscape irrigation.
 | 
|     Section 10. Legislative findings.  | 
|     (a) The General Assembly finds that: | 
|  | 
|         (1) urban storm water, when not properly controlled and  | 
| treated, can cause pollution of the waters of the State,  | 
| threaten public health, and damage property by carrying  | 
| pollutants from our highways, streets, roads, parking  | 
| lots, driveways, sidewalks, alleys, lawns, and other  | 
| surfaces of low permeability into lakes, rivers, streams,  | 
| and ponds; | 
|         (2) development can increase storm water runoff by  | 
| increasing the size and number of paved and other  | 
| impervious surfaces within a watershed and decreasing the  | 
| extent of vegetated and other permeable surface areas that  | 
| control storm water runoff through natural infiltration  | 
| and evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge; | 
|         (3) current urban storm water related threats to the  | 
| State's water resources include pollution, increased water  | 
| temperatures, flooding, groundwater depletion, loss of  | 
| habitat, stream bank erosion, sewer overflows, basement  | 
| backups, contaminated drinking water sources, and  | 
| sedimentation of waterways; and | 
|         (4) some studies show that preserving and expanding  | 
| natural and built green infrastructure can minimize  | 
| negative impacts and enhance the resilience of water  | 
| infrastructure and water bodies. | 
|     (b) The General Assembly also finds that there are a number  | 
| of potential benefits from the use of green infrastructure,  | 
| including: | 
|  | 
|         (1) Cleaner Water. Green infrastructure can reduce the  | 
| volume of storm water runoff in combined and separate sewer  | 
| systems, and the concentrations of pollutants in those  | 
| discharges. | 
|         (2) Enhanced Water Supplies. Most green infrastructure  | 
| approaches allow at least a portion of storm water to  | 
| infiltrate surrounding soil, where it recharges the  | 
| groundwater and stream base flows, contributing to  | 
| drinking water supplies and helping to stabilize aquatic  | 
| ecosystems.  Green infrastructure systems that capture and  | 
| reuse storm water also help to conserve other water  | 
| sources. | 
|         (3) Reduced Flooding. Green infrastructure can help  | 
| control surface flooding and stabilize local hydrology by  | 
| reducing peak flows. | 
|         (4) Cleaner Air. Trees and vegetation improve air  | 
| quality by filtering many airborne pollutants, thereby  | 
| helping to reduce the incidence of respiratory illness. | 
|         (5) Increased Energy Efficiency. Trees and other  | 
| vegetation create shade, reduce the amount of heat  | 
| absorbing materials, and emit water vapor, which controls  | 
| surface temperature, thus helping to alleviate the urban  | 
| heat island effect. Limiting impervious surface, using  | 
| light colored impervious surfaces and green roofs also  | 
| mitigates extreme urban temperatures.  By helping to lower  | 
| ambient temperatures and, when incorporated on and around  | 
|  | 
| buildings, helping to shade and insulate buildings from  | 
| wide temperature swings, green infrastructure can reduce  | 
| the energy needed for heating and cooling. Green roofs and  | 
| shade can increase the life span of roofs, thus reducing  | 
| the need for production and transportation of conventional  | 
| roof materials. Energy use associated with pumping and  | 
| treating can be reduced as storm water is diverted from  | 
| wastewater collection, conveyance, and treatment systems. | 
|         (6) Mitigation of and Adaptation to Impacts of Climate  | 
| Change.  Green infrastructure strategies can reduce energy  | 
| demands and, thus, greenhouse gas emissions by reducing  | 
| storm water volume and the associated treatment required,  | 
| reducing the amount of potable water needed, providing  | 
| thermal insulation and shade for buildings, mitigating the  | 
| urban heat island effect, and sequestering carbon.  These  | 
| strategies can also help with adaptation to projected  | 
| climate change impacts, including increased storm  | 
| intensity, flood potential, and impacts on the quantity of  | 
| surface and ground water supplies. | 
|         (7) Wildlife Habitat. Stream buffers, wetlands, parks,  | 
| meadows, and other forms of green infrastructure increase  | 
| biodiversity within the urban environment. | 
|         (8) Community Benefits. Trees and plants improve urban  | 
| aesthetics and community livability by providing  | 
| recreational and scenic wildlife areas. Studies show that  | 
| property values are higher, violence is reduced, and crime  | 
|  | 
| is reduced when trees and other vegetation are present. | 
|         (9) Health Benefits. Studies show that people who have  | 
| access to the open space provided by green infrastructure  | 
| in their communities get more exercise, live longer, and  | 
| report better health in general. Exposure to green  | 
| infrastructure (even through a window) improves mental  | 
| functioning, reduces stress, and reduces recovery time  | 
| from surgery. | 
|         (10) Green Jobs. Designing, installing, and  | 
| maintaining green infrastructure creates new jobs for  | 
| architects, designers, engineers, construction workers,  | 
| maintenance workers, landscape architects, landscapers,  | 
| nurseries, and related services. | 
|         (11) Cost Savings. Using green infrastructure in  | 
| certain situations can save or reduce (i) capital costs  | 
| associated with paving, constructing curbs and gutters,  | 
| and building large collection and conveyance systems; (ii)  | 
| operating and maintenance expenses for treatment plants,  | 
| pumping stations, pipes, and other hard infrastructure;  | 
| (iii) energy costs for pumping water; (iv) costs associated  | 
| with treatment during wet weather; and (v) costs of  | 
| repairing the damage caused by storm water, such as stream  | 
| bank restoration and flood damage.
 | 
|     Section 15. IEPA Study. By June 30, 2010, the Illinois  | 
| Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the  | 
|  | 
| Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Illinois  | 
| Department of Transportation, the Capital Development Board,  | 
| storm water management agencies, and other interested parties  | 
| that the Agency deems appropriate to include, shall submit to  | 
| the General Assembly and the Governor a report that reviews the  | 
| latest available scientific research and institutional  | 
| knowledge to evaluate and document the following: | 
|     (a) The nature and extent of urban storm water impacts on  | 
| water quality in watersheds in Illinois; | 
|     (b) Potential urban storm water management performance  | 
| standards to address flooding, water pollution, stream  | 
| erosion, habitat quality, and the effectiveness of green  | 
| infrastructure practices to achieve such standards; | 
|     (c) The prevalence of green infrastructure use in Illinois; | 
|     (d) The costs and benefits of green versus grey  | 
| infrastructure; | 
|     (e) Existing and potential new urban storm water management  | 
| regulatory programs and methods and feasibility of integrating  | 
| a State program with existing and potential regional and local  | 
| programs in Illinois; | 
|     (f) Findings and recommendations for adopting an urban  | 
| storm water management regulatory program in Illinois which  | 
| includes performance standards and encourages the use of green  | 
| infrastructure to achieve those standards; and | 
|     (g) The feasibility and consequences of devoting 20% of the  | 
| Water Revolving Fund to green infrastructure, water and energy  |