Section 2005.40 Application
of the Definition
a) In applying Section 2005.30 to determine if an insured
received consultation, advice or treatment from a physician for a disease,
illness, sickness, malady or condition, the consultation, advice or treatment
must be clearly indicated in the insured's medical records or from the statements
of the insured's legally qualified physician or other relevant evidence.
1) If an application contains conflicting answers, or if an
answer is clearly incomplete, the insurer has an obligation to investigate
further. For example, if a question about medical history is answered with the
name of a physician, but there is no statement concerning the condition treated
or the reason for the visit, the insurer has an obligation to investigate
further. An insurer failing to make that investigation and then taking
appropriate action would be estopped from using a "pre-existing
condition" or "pre-existing illness" as grounds for denying the
claim or rescinding the policy for the particular disease, illness, sickness,
malady or condition.
2) If a particular disease, illness, sickness, malady or
condition was not diagnosed by a legally qualified physician before the
effective date of the coverage for the insured, but symptomatology was evident
regardless of consultation, advice or treatment by a legally qualified
physician, the disease or condition will not be considered pre-existing if
there were interrogatories appropriate to the symptoms on the application for
insurance and if the symptoms were disclosed on the application for insurance
and the insurer did not make an investigation and take appropriate action.
3) If there was no application or the interrogatories on any
application for insurance were not appropriate to the symptoms, a legally
qualified physician must decide if the symptomatology was sufficient prior to
the effective date of the policy to make a diagnosis and demonstrate
manifestation of the disease, illness, sickness, malady or condition.
4) In the administration of this Section, if the Medical
Director, similar employee or other physician retained by the insurer who
qualifies as a legally qualified physician decides the medical questions of Section
2005.30(a)(2) or (a)(3), the physician shall notify either the insured or his or
her attending physician or other legally qualified physician of the insured of
all of the relevant facts supporting the decision. If the attending physician
or other legally qualified physician of the insured offers facts that
demonstrate there is good reason that the disease, illness, sickness, malady or
condition did not exist prior to the effective date of coverage for the
insured, the definition of a pre-existing illness must be construed favorably
for the insured.
b) A legally qualified physician is a physician as defined and
licensed under the Medical Practice Act [225 ILCS 60].
c) The insurer may rescind a policy only if it can demonstrate
the insured has withheld material information or answered material questions
incorrectly on an application that would have resulted in the insurer, at the
time of original application:
1) denying coverage; or
2) restricting (i.e., decreasing) the level or coverage applied
for; or
3) rating up (i.e., increasing) the premium normally charged for
the coverage applied for.
d) No answers to questions in an application for insurance such
as "Are you in good health?" or "Are you free from disease or
impairment?" shall be used alone to rescind the policy unless the false
answers to those questions, along with the other evidence, clearly demonstrates
justification for rescission of the policy.
e) After the coverage for the insured has been in effect for two
years, the coverage may not be rescinded except for fraud. To establish fraud,
the insurer must meet the requirements of Illinois law in this regard.
(Source: Amended at 38 Ill.
Reg. 2132, effective January 2, 2014)