|
Public Act 104-0587 |
| HB3175 Enrolled | LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b |
|
|
AN ACT concerning transportation. |
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, |
represented in the General Assembly: |
Section 5. The Illinois Vehicle Code is amended by |
changing Section 11-208.9 as follows: |
(625 ILCS 5/11-208.9) |
Sec. 11-208.9. Automated traffic law enforcement system; |
approaching, overtaking, and passing a school bus. |
(a) As used in this Section, "automated traffic law |
enforcement system" means a device with one or more motor |
vehicle sensors working in conjunction with the visual signals |
on a school bus, as specified in Sections 12-803 and 12-805 of |
this Code, to produce recorded images of motor vehicles that |
fail to stop before meeting or overtaking, from either |
direction, any school bus stopped at any location for the |
purpose of receiving or discharging pupils in violation of |
Section 11-1414 of this Code or a similar provision of a local |
ordinance. |
An automated traffic law enforcement system is a system, |
in a municipality or county operated by a governmental agency, |
that produces a recorded image of a motor vehicle's violation |
of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance and is |
designed to obtain a clear recorded image of the vehicle and |
|
the vehicle's license plate. The recorded image must also |
display the time, date, and location of the violation. |
(b) As used in this Section, "recorded images" means |
images recorded by an automated traffic law enforcement system |
on: |
(1) 2 or more photographs; |
(2) 2 or more microphotographs; |
(3) 2 or more electronic images; or |
(4) a video recording showing the motor vehicle and, |
on at least one image or portion of the recording, clearly |
identifying the registration plate or digital registration |
plate number of the motor vehicle. |
(c) A municipality or county that produces a recorded |
image of a motor vehicle's violation of a provision of this |
Code or a local ordinance must make the recorded images of a |
violation accessible to the alleged violator by providing the |
alleged violator with a website address, accessible through |
the Internet. |
(d) For each violation of a provision of this Code or a |
local ordinance recorded by an automated traffic law |
enforcement system, the county or municipality having |
jurisdiction shall issue a written notice of the violation to |
the registered owner of the vehicle, who shall be liable for |
the violation unless otherwise provided in this Section as the |
alleged violator. The notice shall be delivered to the |
registered owner of the vehicle, by mail, within 30 days after |
|
the Secretary of State notifies the municipality or county |
confirms of the identity of the owner of the vehicle, but in no |
event later than 90 days after the violation. |
(e) The notice required under subsection (d) shall |
include: |
(1) the name and address of the registered owner of |
the vehicle; |
(2) the registration number of the motor vehicle |
involved in the violation; |
(3) the violation charged; |
(4) the location where the violation occurred; |
(5) the date and time of the violation; |
(6) a copy of the recorded images; |
(7) the amount of the civil penalty imposed and the |
date by which the civil penalty should be paid; |
(8) a statement that recorded images are evidence of a |
violation of overtaking or passing a school bus stopped |
for the purpose of receiving or discharging pupils; |
(9) a warning that failure to pay the civil penalty or |
to contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of |
liability; |
(10) a statement that the person may elect to proceed |
by: |
(A) paying the fine; or |
(B) challenging the charge in court, by mail, or |
by administrative hearing; and |
|
(11) a website address, accessible through the |
Internet, where the person may view the recorded images of |
the violation. |
(e-5) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a |
school bus was stopped for the purpose of receiving or |
discharging pupils and that the visual signals as specified in |
Sections 12-803 and 12-805 were in operation on the school bus |
when recorded images produced by an automated traffic law |
enforcement system show: |
(1) an activated stop signal arm; and |
(2) an electronic indicator indicating activation of |
school bus visual signals. |
(f) (Blank). |
(g) Based on inspection of recorded images produced by an |
automated traffic law enforcement system, a notice alleging |
that the violation occurred shall be evidence of the facts |
contained in the notice and admissible in any proceeding |
alleging a violation under this Section. |
(h) Recorded images made by an automated traffic law |
enforcement system are confidential and shall be made |
available only to the alleged violator and governmental and |
law enforcement agencies for purposes of adjudicating a |
violation of this Section, for statistical purposes, or for |
other governmental purposes. Any recorded image evidencing a |
violation of this Section, however, may be admissible in any |
proceeding resulting from the issuance of the citation. |
|
(i) The court or hearing officer may consider in defense |
of a violation: |
(1) that the motor vehicle or registration plates or |
digital registration plates of the motor vehicle were |
stolen before the violation occurred and not under the |
control of or in the possession of the owner or lessee at |
the time of the violation; |
(1.5) that the motor vehicle was hijacked before the |
violation occurred and not under the control of or in the |
possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the |
violation; |
(2) that the driver of the motor vehicle received a |
Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer for a |
violation of Section 11-1414 of this Code within |
one-eighth of a mile and 15 minutes of the violation that |
was recorded by the system; |
(3) that the visual signals required by Sections |
12-803 and 12-805 of this Code were damaged, not |
activated, not present in violation of Sections 12-803 and |
12-805, or inoperable; and |
(4) any other evidence or issues provided by municipal |
or county ordinance. |
(j) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle was hijacked or |
the motor vehicle or registration plates or digital |
registration plates were stolen before the violation occurred |
and were not under the control or possession of the owner or |
|
lessee at the time of the violation, the owner or lessee must |
submit proof that a report concerning the motor vehicle or |
registration plates was filed with a law enforcement agency in |
a timely manner. |
(k) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle received a |
Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer at the time of |
the violation, the motor vehicle owner is subject to a |
mandatory civil penalty of $300 not exceeding $150 for a first |
time violation or $1,000 $500 for a second or subsequent |
violation, plus an additional penalty of not more than $100 |
for failure to pay the original penalty in a timely manner, if |
the motor vehicle is recorded by an automated traffic law |
enforcement system. A violation for which a civil penalty is |
imposed under this Section is not a violation of a traffic |
regulation governing the movement of vehicles and may not be |
recorded on the driving record of the owner of the vehicle, but |
may be recorded by the municipality or county for the purpose |
of determining if a person is subject to the higher fine for a |
second or subsequent offense. |
(l) A school bus equipped with an automated traffic law |
enforcement system must be posted with a sign indicating that |
the school bus is being monitored by an automated traffic law |
enforcement system. |
(m) A municipality or county that has one or more school |
buses equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement |
system must provide notice to drivers by posting a list of |
|
school districts using school buses equipped with an automated |
traffic law enforcement system on the municipality or county |
website. School districts that have one or more school buses |
equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement system must |
provide notice to drivers by posting that information on their |
websites. |
(n) A municipality or county operating an automated |
traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical |
analysis to assess the safety impact in each school district |
using school buses equipped with an automated traffic law |
enforcement system following installation of the system and |
every 2 years thereafter. A municipality or county operating |
an automated speed enforcement system before the effective |
date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly |
shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety |
impact of the system by no later than one year after the |
effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General |
Assembly and every 2 years thereafter. Each statistical |
analysis shall be based upon the best available crash, |
traffic, and other data, and shall cover a period of time |
before and after installation of the system sufficient to |
provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact. |
Each statistical analysis shall be consistent with |
professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. Each |
statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data |
required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions |
|
and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following |
the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement |
system. Each statistical analysis required by this subsection |
shall be made available to the public and shall be published on |
the website of the municipality or county. If a statistical |
analysis indicates that there has been an increase in the rate |
of crashes at the approach to school buses monitored by the |
system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional |
studies to determine the cause and severity of the crashes, |
and may take any action that it determines is necessary or |
appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the crashes |
involving school buses equipped with an automated traffic law |
enforcement system. |
(o) The compensation paid for an automated traffic law |
enforcement system must be based on the value of the equipment |
or the services provided and may not be based on the number of |
traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by the |
system. |
(o-1) No member of the General Assembly and no officer or |
employee of a municipality or county shall knowingly accept |
employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a |
vendor that provides automated traffic law enforcement system |
equipment or services to municipalities or counties. No former |
member of the General Assembly shall, within a period of 2 |
years immediately after the termination of service as a member |
of the General Assembly, knowingly accept employment or |
|
receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that |
provides automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or |
services to municipalities or counties. No former officer or |
employee of a municipality or county shall, within a period of |
2 years immediately after the termination of municipal or |
county employment, knowingly accept employment or receive |
compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides |
automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or services |
to municipalities or counties. |
(p) No person who is the lessor of a motor vehicle pursuant |
to a written lease agreement shall be liable for an automated |
speed or traffic law enforcement system violation involving |
such motor vehicle during the period of the lease; provided |
that upon the request of the appropriate authority received |
within 120 days after the violation occurred, the lessor |
provides within 60 days after such receipt the name and |
address of the lessee. |
Upon the provision of information by the lessor pursuant |
to this subsection, the county or municipality may issue the |
violation to the lessee of the vehicle in the same manner as it |
would issue a violation to a registered owner of a vehicle |
pursuant to this Section, and the lessee may be held liable for |
the violation. |
(q) (Blank). |
(r) After a municipality or county enacts an ordinance |
providing for automated traffic law enforcement systems under |
|
this Section, each school district within that municipality or |
county's jurisdiction may implement an automated traffic law |
enforcement system under this Section. The elected school |
board for that district must approve the implementation of an |
automated traffic law enforcement system. The school district |
shall be responsible for entering into a contract, approved by |
the elected school board of that district, with vendors for |
the installation, maintenance, and operation of the automated |
traffic law enforcement system. The school district must enter |
into an intergovernmental agreement, approved by the elected |
school board of that district, with the municipality or county |
with jurisdiction over that school district for the |
administration of the automated traffic law enforcement |
system. The proceeds from a school district's automated |
traffic law enforcement system's fines shall be divided |
equally between the school district and the municipality or |
county administering the automated traffic law enforcement |
system. |
(s) If a county or municipality changes the vendor it uses |
for its automated traffic law enforcement system and must, as |
a consequence, apply for a permit, approval, or other |
authorization from the Department for reinstallation of one or |
more malfunctioning components of that system and if, at the |
time of the application, the new vendor operates an automated |
traffic law enforcement system for any other county or |
municipality in the State, then the Department shall approve |
|
or deny the county or municipality's application for that |
permit, approval, or other authorization within 90 days after |
its receipt. |
(t) The Department may revoke any permit, approval, or |
other authorization granted to a county or municipality for |
the placement, installation, or operation of an automated |
traffic law enforcement system if any official or employee who |
serves that county or municipality is charged with bribery, |
official misconduct, or a similar crime related to the |
placement, installation, or operation of the automated traffic |
law enforcement system in the county or municipality. |
The Department shall adopt any rules necessary to |
implement and administer this subsection. The rules adopted by |
the Department shall describe the revocation process, shall |
ensure that notice of the revocation is provided, and shall |
provide an opportunity to appeal the revocation. Any county or |
municipality that has a permit, approval, or other |
authorization revoked under this subsection may not reapply |
for such a permit, approval, or other authorization for a |
period of 1 year after the revocation. |
(Source: P.A. 102-905, eff. 1-1-23; 102-982, eff. 7-1-23; |
103-154, eff. 6-30-23; 103-364, eff. 7-28-23.) |